Over on Sustainable Life Media, Matt Heinz has a great post on Best Practices for Successful Eco-Labeling.
He boils it down to what we've been saying here and here, to be perceived as the genuine green article at some point you have to prove it. In Matt's words:
"What are you claiming on your green labels, and how can you prove it? Can you summarize those proof points on the label itself? Has a credible third-party endorsed your sustainability practices? Could their logo be placed within your label to add credibility?
Think carefully about not just the claim you make on the label, but how that label’s contents help prove or validate the claim. Think as well as about how the label could be a starting point for that proof. For example, include a short, user-friendly URL on the label inviting customers (and prospective customers) to learn more about your sustainability claims. That URL destination can have all kinds of one-way and two-way information – updates on progressive sustainability initiatives, collective customer impact on reducing a carbon footprint (based on sales and pass-along, for example), etc."
What he is suggesting is exactly what Forbo has done. Forbo's proof runs through the entire company and out through their product line. For an inside look and case study to follow, feel free to download yourself a copy. You'll find it on the top left hand corner of the is blog.




Brody, thank you for the accountability vote. A few additional thoughts. You don't prove sustainability with just a carbon footprint that excludes suppliers and resource extraction. Openeco looks like a good start, but the biggest impacts occur at the supplier and extraction stage.
In terms of the other recognized 11 environmental impacts in LCAs, it also doesn't look like Openeco proves it over all product stages / across the life cycle with a transparent label that's third party audited globally so there is a level playing field for product purchasers and manufacturers.
Openeco and Natural Logic are a good starts for internal audits but not for life cycle
product selection and comparison.
In contrast, SMaRT provides the credible consensus label covering LCA impacts that
can be used by purchasers. This is what's required by FTC for a sustainable
product.
Posted by: Mary | February 20, 2008 at 07:34 PM
You can prove it at www.openeco.org where you can calculate your carbon footprint, compare it to other's and then learn ways to reduce it! Ah, accountability...
Posted by: Brody | February 19, 2008 at 05:09 PM